<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good marketing does not equal bad beer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2007/07/11/good-marketing-does-not-equal-bad-beer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2007/07/11/good-marketing-does-not-equal-bad-beer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:46:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Warbiany</title>
		<link>http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2007/07/11/good-marketing-does-not-equal-bad-beer/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Warbiany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaynightbrewery.com/?p=261#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree with the gist of this post, but would suggest that &quot;big beer&quot; doesn&#039;t have any problems with quality control or quality ingredients.  They make their products with processes that make us homebrewers look like neanderthals, and make the average craft brewer look like they&#039;re living before the industrial revolution.

&quot;Big beer&quot; is just fine when it comes to ingredients, quality control, and consistency.  I just don&#039;t like their product, because &quot;big beer&quot; isn&#039;t big on flavor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with the gist of this post, but would suggest that &#8220;big beer&#8221; doesn&#8217;t have any problems with quality control or quality ingredients.  They make their products with processes that make us homebrewers look like neanderthals, and make the average craft brewer look like they&#8217;re living before the industrial revolution.</p>
<p>&#8220;Big beer&#8221; is just fine when it comes to ingredients, quality control, and consistency.  I just don&#8217;t like their product, because &#8220;big beer&#8221; isn&#8217;t big on flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2007/07/11/good-marketing-does-not-equal-bad-beer/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaynightbrewery.com/?p=261#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Anheuser-Busch has the best of everything - the best marketing, the best ingredients and the best quality control. So that&#039;s where the marketing kicks in. The beer itself is so nondescript that the only way to steer people toward it is through marketing. So Bill is on with his statement, though I imagine there is not a brewer out there that couldn&#039;t learn volumes from AB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anheuser-Busch has the best of everything &#8211; the best marketing, the best ingredients and the best quality control. So that&#8217;s where the marketing kicks in. The beer itself is so nondescript that the only way to steer people toward it is through marketing. So Bill is on with his statement, though I imagine there is not a brewer out there that couldn&#8217;t learn volumes from AB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

