http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2009/07/14/monday-night-recap-eye-candy-edition/ Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:46:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2009/07/14/monday-night-recap-eye-candy-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-26862 dude in pants Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:18:50 +0000 http://mondaynightbrewery.com/?p=1670#comment-26862 Original Gravity or... Final Gravity? Original Gravity or… Final Gravity?

]]> http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2009/07/14/monday-night-recap-eye-candy-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-26781 Jonathan Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:34:01 +0000 http://mondaynightbrewery.com/?p=1670#comment-26781 We obviously waited until the bubbles settled to take the reading, then we used microscopic glasses to see if it was 1.0490 or 1.0485. It was 1.0490000. Even more accurate than we predicted. We obviously waited until the bubbles settled to take the reading, then we used microscopic glasses to see if it was 1.0490 or 1.0485. It was 1.0490000. Even more accurate than we predicted.

]]> http://mondaynightbrewing.com/2009/07/14/monday-night-recap-eye-candy-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-26777 Kevin Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:21:53 +0000 http://mondaynightbrewery.com/?p=1670#comment-26777 I don't know. This may be picking the proverbial nit, but that hydrometer appears to have loads of bubbles attached to it, which would throw your OG reading off. I would say based on the bubble concentration, your OG was no better than 1.0485. I don’t know. This may be picking the proverbial nit, but that hydrometer appears to have loads of bubbles attached to it, which would throw your OG reading off. I would say based on the bubble concentration, your OG was no better than 1.0485.

]]>